MANILA, Philippines — The camp of Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) District Engineer Henry Alcantara denied accusations linking him to alleged ghost flood control projects in Bulacan, insisting he had no hand in the supposed scheme.
In a statement issued over the weekend, the Flaminiano Arroyo & Dueñas law firm, which represents Alcantara, said its client “maintains his innocence: he did not author these alleged ghost projects. Any wrongdoing was done behind his back, without his knowledge, acquiescence, or approval.”
The statement directly counters claims that Alcantara was the “kingpin” of the controversial projects, which authorities are now investigating for possible irregularities., This news data comes from:http://pebt-msr-vlp-qjw.771bg.com
“Engr. Alcantara will contest every accusation that he had supposedly participated in and/or benefitted from any unlawful scheme,” the law firm said, adding that he would exhaust all legal remedies, including challenging his summary dismissal from service.
DPWH engineer denies role in Bulacan flood control ‘ghost projects’
The camp also vowed Alcantara’s cooperation with the ongoing investigation. “He will continue to assist the authorities in the investigation of these flood control ghost projects. We are confident that in due time, the truth will surface and Engr. Alcantara will be cleared of the baseless accusations levied against him,” the statement read.

- PNP disputes China's crime advisory, says Philippines crime rate dropped
- Taiwan: China illegally deploying oil rigs in its waters
- Maduro hits ‘illegal’ US troops deployment
- Lacson: Senators not exempt from scrutiny in ghost flood control project scandal
- Thai opposition holds kingmaking summit deciding new PM
- Metro Manila disaster agencies expand response areas in preparation for 'Big One'
- Comelec to resume BARMM polls ballot printing Thursday
- Afghanistan earthquake kills more than 800
- Marcos orders 'sweeping review' of DPWH budget under 2026 NEP
- Police general suspended for ‘obstruction’ of evidence in case of missing sabungeros